I guess just because they drift off. Or at least you cant be sure of keeping them together.
Sometimes you want a whole bunch of things to all happen "synchronously", to all happen in the same phase every time. An example is the paf~ algorithm, and here's little drum machine example attached. So you usually have just one phasor that is your master timebase and derive everything from that. The difference is that with a metro you get messages as discrete events, but with the phasor you get a continuous time marker - try changing the tempo in the drum machine example to something very low ;) On Fri, 1 Dec 2006 21:22:21 +0100 Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 01/12/2006, at 14.35, hard off wrote: > > > i want a phasor~ to send a bang when the signal reaches 1. > > I the risk of showing off serious lack of knowledge: When is this > approach different from using a metro object with the same > "frequency" as the phasor~? > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
phase-synchronous-drums.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
