Hallo, Cesare Marilungo hat gesagt: // Cesare Marilungo wrote: > Frank Barknecht wrote: > >This is possible. The additive synth bell example I posted shows one > >way how to address each instance seperatly. You get the voice number > >as first argument so you can do various things with it inside the > >poly-abstraction. > > > >Another example is attached, which is more traditional and is built > >around [poly]. Both approaches don't use the voice allocation of > >nqpoly4 at all: Nobody forces you to use it, and I generally don't use > >it anyways. > > I missed that. But the attached patch does what I was trying to do. > > Cool!
Actually you've made me think that it would be a good idea to have an inlet in nqpoly4 for data as produced by the [poly] object. Then one wouldn't need to make the send/receive pair by hand. Currently nqpoly4 implements one voice allocation algorithm which is a bit limited and only really useful for granular synthesis, but not so useful for Midi-inspired polyphony, where the note length isn't known in advance. I think, a successor of nqpoly4 should not care about voice allocation at all by itself. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list