On Dec 10, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Cesare Marilungo hat gesagt: // Cesare Marilungo wrote:
Thanks, I'll try it.
Cool. I've made some further changes which make polypoly a bit more
useful. I removed the need to have an inlet as a loadbang replacement
in the polypoly-abstractions that are automatically created.
Loadbangs can now be used just like in any other abstraction.
Then I reused the existing right inlet of the polypoly-abstractions as
an inlet to customize it. The inlet is connected to polypoly's middle
inlet now. (I guess I will remove the third inlet ot [polypoly] as
it's not useful with [poly] because you cannot change the polyphony of
[poly] with a message anyway).
I think, this now is a really useful approach to make traditional and
even some not so traditional approaches to polyphony easy in Pd. (Yes,
Hans, it will go to CVS soon. ;)
Oh wait, aren't I suppose to nag here? Hmm, now I don't know what to
say! ;)
I vote for a more descriptive name, like [poly_allocate] or
[poly_voices] or something...
.hc
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
<polypoly.tgz>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
