On Dec 30, 2006, at 10:41 PM, David NG McCallum wrote:
On 27/12/06, Tim Blechmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you mean that it would be difficult to figure out what's a
DSP object
> and what's not, in terms of figuring out what's in the DSP chain?
from the user point of view, i think, it's a good idea, to have a
specific separation between dsp and messaging, because both work with
very different concepts.
Maybe I shouldn't be jumping into this discussion so late, with little
programming knowledge, but…
If we're to think about the metaphor of dataflow languages, which is
essentially modelled after electronics and circuits (and I'm thinking
about analogue circuits, although I'm sure a similar argument could be
made for digital), then there should be no difference between
"control" and "audio," because they're the exact same thing.
We might think that separating control and audio makes perfect sense
from a user standpoint---I even think so. But I'm pretty sure that we
only think that way because we've learned to think within the dataflow
paradigm. If this distinction never existed, we wouldn't think twice
about mixing the types, because there wouldn't be any types.
I remember learning the difference between floats and ints. From a
user's standpoint, why bother? I remember resigning myself to "well
that's annoying, but I guess it's necessary." Why does Pd not
distinguish, but Max does?
As far as I understand, the difference between control and audio data
exists purely for computational efficiency, and has no real conceptual
basis. (Maybe I'm asking for a beatdown with that statement…)
Yes, a lot of this kind of stuff is done for efficiency's sake, like
messages vs. audio rate data. Its hard to get around that. But the
strong types of symbol vs. float are an human-computer interface
question.
.hc
D!
--
__ _ _ _ __ _
http://sintheta.org
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"[W]e have invented the technology to eliminate scarcity, but we are
deliberately throwing it away to benefit those who profit from
scarcity." -John Gilmore
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
