Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: > anyway, why do you want to have a litteral '$0' in the abstraction > argument and not the value, that it represents, since it is actually the > same? if i am not totally mistaken, this would only make sense, when you > plan to save the patch with all the dynamically generated stuff, whereas > saving dynamically generated stuff does not make sense at all, as far as > i can see it. the only case i could think of, that would require > litteral '$0's as abstraction arguments, would be, if you would use > dynamic patching just as a quicker way of patching.
... which actually is a very sensible usecase! Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
