I think this is what is called "selective perception". Nobody said that it's generally illegal, like nothing is. all the best, Thomas
marius schebella schrieb: > sad, but you're absolutely right. > marius. > > Yves Degoyon wrote: > >> ola, >> >> >>> It would be good to find out what the legal status of code >>> that is illegally licensed. We've had this issue before with the >>> not-for-military-use clause that Yves added to his software, rendering >>> it technically illegal. A lawyer could tell us if it's a) in legal limbo >>> land where nobody is legally allowed to use it b) defaults to public >>> domain c) something else weird. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> in fact, i'm glad of considering my software 'illegal' >> when you see what the 'law' ( mainly american ) >> and the OMC are able to achieve with tricks. >> >> saludos, >> sevy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> >> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > -- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
