moritz wrote:
> hello
> 
> i could not find how to give gemhead a lower rate, right now it gives 20 
> "gem_state" per second, i only need 12 per second.
> i think i can save cpu with that, or am i wrong?
> 
> thanx
> 
> 
> moritz
> 
ooups,
i just find out, that the frame argument for [gemwin] sets the speed for 
  [gemhead] too.

sorry for my spam

moritz

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to