True, it would be great if these features were somehow automated. Like a dynamic object creation scheme where the external libraries and abstractions are created as arguments as they are imported.
Probably too much wishing on my end for that though! ~Kyle On 5/15/07, Georg Holzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo! > > > A more robust way of loading "stuff" (from fx. an untar'd tar ball) > > would make a better solution. I.e. something that works in different > > distributions (extended, vanilla, etc), is independent from the > > preference and is not a shell script with a bunch of start up > > options. This rant/request might be utter rubbish though - please let > > me know. > > That's what declare, import and etc. is for ... > > LG > Georg > > _______________________________________________ > PD-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > -- http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com (((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
