Good afternoon, Eni, :) Le dimanche 10 juin 2007 à 12:24 +0200, Enrique Erne a écrit : > good morning patrice
> i thought you got the patch through netpd's creator. > I'm sorry, I've mixed two different discussions, this part wasn't net-pd related. > please tell me which patch is missing an abstraction and where you got > it from, sp i can fix it. at least it should be mentioned in the wiki. > Concerning net-pd, I'd rather have suggestions that certainly won't be taken into account, because I've ever given a try in net-pd chat, it's about aesthetic of some patches, for example, one you've developped called 'jamx'; this sequencer is very usefull, ... but it misses very handfull things for composing faster, like copy-paste between each page, colored buttons. Let alone the missing polyphonic stuff, I know how it could be difficult to make one with pd-vanilla gui, and that you have ever done a good very job. > i don't know if creator can update itself, but that sounds like > micrsoft/apple > "new software has been installed, your computer is ready to restart" > :-) My mind might be corrupted by long years of composing on such environment, :D > netclient/netserver sends ascii data which we use for patches > and control information. Oh yes, and haven't you developped a patch that dynamically build patches from pd files, it's very interesting, I think it could be used for implementing on net-pd environment any pd-vanilla patch with replacing adc~ dac~ for connecting it to the mixer, sorry, my head is full of those kinds of crappy ideas...:p > i personally don't like the idea of an authority deciding which patches > get accepted for the netpd project. > > i prefer the free direct system it now has. if you fix a bug just > increase > the version msg and netload it again. every user connected get's the > fix. > > all the user have the same rights. no royalty. no "animalfarm" > also the server is only the gate to others.. it doesn't do much > else than sending the incoming msgs to the connected users. Agreed. > see links > http://www.netpd.org/mx > http://www.netpd.org/I2mx > http://www.netpd.org/HowtoBuildFx4Mx Ok, thanks. > i don't think that it is a good idea to put these instructions into > the abstractions. not even an html link? > > also you are very welcome to login the netpd chat and ask before you > spend > other 2 hours. I'll be glad to have a jam session soon... > regards > > eni > > Best, Patko. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
