Sure enough... It does not work in Pd. I checked and it still worked in Max/FTS vintage 1993, so it's Pd at fault :)
M On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 05:12:31PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Miller Puckette wrote: > > >It's lame, but the idea behind the original design of "pack/unpack" > >was to have the argument lists look the same. So, to send a variety > >of (known-type) data down a send/receive channel or whatnot, one could > >use "pack tea for 2" and a corresponding "unpack tea for 2". > > error: pack: tea: bad type > > could you please use an example that actually does not cause an error in > your own pd? > > There's no way to use "tea" and "for" as being default values in that > context. > > _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... > | Mathieu Bouchard - t?l:+1.514.383.3801, Montr?al QC Canada > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
