On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Matteo Sisti Sette hat gesagt: // Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
Am I using some 0.40-only feature?
I think not, because your approach was the one used in the past, when
[send] wasn't settable yet. But anyway: I also think, you're cheating,
ecause you're actually changing the message box and thus creating many
different message boxes on the fly, while the [s] isn't changed for
variable length lists.
A messagebox is a messagebox. Unlike objectboxes, they are not magically
recreated. Instead, the internal binbuf gets cleared. Sending "set"
messages to messageboxes isn't much different from sending a float to a
[hsl] or [nbx] in "init" mode... and even in "no init" mode, if you look
at saved files closely.
I think you need some categorisation of state with more than two levels,
e.g.:
1. purely volatile state;
2. something that will be saved in the patch;
3. something that will also be reloaded from file;
4. dynamic patching: obj, msg, connect, ...
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
