On Tuesday 21 August 2007 06:05, Chris McCormick wrote:
> My 2 Zimbabwe dollars: I agree that there is no nice reason for those
> clumps, and one more inconsistency in Pd would do more good than bad in
> this case. I would say making $0 do the same thing in message boxes and
> abstraction arguments would overall save time for users and only add a
> very small amount of easily-explainable complication.

At the same time can we also get rid of the 'only $s at the beginning of a 
string get interpreted' rule?

Nesting abstractions within abstractions just to get that is sometimes not an 
option.


robert.

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to