Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:59 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> hard off wrote: >>> i got it! >>> >>> a settable send using only pd vanilla objects. >> why don't you just use [send] instead of [setsend]? >> i don't see any added functionality in this abstraction (but an added >> dependency on the abstraction) > > are you reading the list?
yes i am. > > it's about to overcome the problem, that the settable [send] is an only >> =0.40 feature. i am not talking about using the new (set) feature of [send], but about replacing [setsend] with [send]. have you had a look at [setsend]? [inlet] | [send $1] which is a wrapper for [send]: it has the very same functionality (in any version of pd) fmadsr. IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
