On Friday 28 September 2007 03:10:53 Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > 1. why does list deserve a shortcut like that when neither [symbol] nor > [pointer] have one? Because [s] is already taken and pointers aren't used that often ? I don't really understand where you're getting at. Do you suggest to remove it ?
> 2. how much should [list append] be like [f] in order to deserve that kind > of favour? I don't see that [list] needs to behave at all like [float] to "deserve" a shortcut: [trigger] and [send] are nothing like [float]. However, I'd rather not have a one character shortcut point to a deprecated/buggy object. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
