IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > - [list append] is _not_ exactly the same as [lister]. you can make a > [lister] (or [l]) _abstraction_ with built-in objects: > > | | > [route bang] | > | | | > | [t b a] | > +----------+ | | > | +--+ > [list append ] > | > > > - afaik, this patchlet is 100% compatible, if you feed all the arguments > of [lister] to the [list append] replacement. > > > - this patchlet cannot be made into a 100% compatible _abstraction_ with
what i mean is: you can replace [l] with the above code. but you cannot simply make an abstraction [l] containing the above code and expect it to behave identically. fgmad.r IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
