On Mer Oct 3 8:45 , IOhannes m zmoelnig sent:
>Enrique Erne wrote: >> hi community >> >> i patched a prototype for a gigatable abstraction to overcome the 16777216 >> sample >> limit >> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-09/053479.html >> >> as a side product i got some abs that could be useful.. >> >> [between~] with 2 arguments to specify a range and outputs 0/1 if the >> incoming >> signal is within that range (purepd). it seems to work so far... >> >> gt~ and lt~ are purepd abstractions of zexy's ~. a difference is the >> second inline where the zexy object accept signal _and_ control values for >> the >> second inlet. it should be easy to add the second inlet but only signal _or_ >> control can be done of corse. >> > >not to be offsensive, but zexy's [~] are (optionally) >implemented as abstractions that require nothing buth a "pd-vanilla" >distribution (though they are not purepd, strictly speaking) i see. simply with expr :-) the <~ >~ seems to be pretty much standard, will they ever make it into pd-vanilla or is there a license issue? >nevertheless, i like the approach with tables. > > >btw, the [gt~] does not seem to behave correctly for small values >(because of the 1e-6 offset)... oups yes.. here's an update
gt~.pd
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
