Mathieu Bouchard wrote: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> we don't provide linux binaries because of dependency issues. >> (chances are low that my binary will work on your machine) > > This is something that gets fixed using static linking, no? But perhaps > making correct static linking while building a shared library is not so > easy, compared to making a standalone app. > > A few years ago, I had written this line, in order to compile with > libruby.a and still produce a .so : > > lib = "-Wl,--whole-archive"+lib+"-Wl,--no-whole-archive" unless OSX > > You give those options to GCC, but the "-Wl," means "delegate the > following option directly to LD" > > Have you ever tried that?
no i haven't. but here Gem depends on 61 libraries (including the most standard stuff), i guess the resulting lib will get quite big... fmadsr. IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
