Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote: > there was a discussion 3 years ago about the inlet of loadbang. I see > now that loadbang has lost its inlet, but actually it would be nice to > have it back and to make it react to a bang message. 3 years ago frank > and IOhannes said, they would vote for this feature too. > I think this feature is helpful, when you edit a patch and want to > retrigger the loadbang. > I know that this can also be done by a message > ;pd-patchname.pd loadbang > but that is not so intuitive and also more time-consuming to write. and > also for max compatibility...
Ah, does Max have an inlet in [loadbang]? Anyway another workaround is to use an abstraction: [inlet] | | [loadbang] |/ [outlet] You could even put a [receive $1] inside. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
