Le mardi 20 novembre 2007 à 22:24 +0100, Frank Barknecht a écrit : > Hallo, > marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote: > > > there was a discussion 3 years ago about the inlet of loadbang. I see > > now that loadbang has lost its inlet, but actually it would be nice to > > have it back and to make it react to a bang message. 3 years ago frank > > and IOhannes said, they would vote for this feature too. > > I think this feature is helpful, when you edit a patch and want to > > retrigger the loadbang. > > I know that this can also be done by a message > > ;pd-patchname.pd loadbang > > but that is not so intuitive and also more time-consuming to write. and > > also for max compatibility... > > Ah, does Max have an inlet in [loadbang]? > > Anyway another workaround is to use an abstraction: > > [inlet] > | > | [loadbang] > |/ > [outlet] > > You could even put a [receive $1] inside.
You could even use the init.lb abstraction of pdmtl, which has plenty of init.* ... ++ O.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
