salut Cyrille,
Maybe the following will be helpful. (MacBook Pro, 2.4 GHz Core 2 duo, OS 10.5.1, 2GB ram) /Applications/Pd-0.40.3-extended-20071117.app running with no patch open: PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE 4784 pd 21.3% 0:37.54 6 98 288 4444K 4152K 12M 40 /Applications/Pd-0.40.3-extended-20071117.app with example pmpd #22 open and gemwin open still not running: PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE 4784 pd 23.5% 2:09.90 6 129 422 10M 16M 23M 414M /Applications/Pd-0.40.3-extended-20071117.app with example pmpd #22 open and running: PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE 4784 pd 39.1% 3:32.09 6 129 423 11M 13M 23M 414M Andrew > i just made a performance test on osX, using pmpd exemple 22 (i had > similar > problem with other patch, this is just an exemple) > > with pd extended, or pd/Gem and pmpd compiled from cvs, this patch use > about > 40% CPU on a macbook pro 2.33Ghz. > > on my computer (dual core 2Ghz), it use about 22% (in both case, % are > mesure for only 1 CPU : both computer are dual core) > i did not do any thing special in my computer to optimise compilation, > nor in the macbook. > > could anyone with a macbook pro could test this patch and tell me the > CPU used? _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
