On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 14:33 -0500, vade wrote:
> Yeah, giving people a CHOICE is certainly condescending, what the [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
calm down. i have the impression, that you completely misunderstood
matju's point. or am i misunderstanding something? i think, he meant,
that for (lazy) devs it is easier to find a ('condescending') reason to
not implement a certain feature than just implementing straight away.
it seems to me, that you both are on the same track.. :-)
roman
please calm down. i think, that is exactly what matju meant
> On Dec 5, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
>
> >> If the people want it, why not give it to them?
> >
> > Because it's easier to write a condescending justification for the
> > lack of segmented patchcords than to write the code for segmented
> > patchcords.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
