On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Roman Haefeli wrote:
calm down. i have the impression, that you completely misunderstood
matju's point. or am i misunderstanding something? i think, he meant,
that for (lazy) devs it is easier to find a ('condescending') reason to
not implement a certain feature than just implementing straight away.
If you browse the archive of pd-list you will find quite often mails that
are basically "you want segmented patchcords just because you can't patch
properly". You don't need to put quotes and parens around condescending.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
