Hallo, cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote: > i think if the input can only be a phasor you can : > -differenciate the phasor (with a biquad: out(t) = in(t) - in(t-1) ) > -ignore negative value (with a test on a expr~ object by exemple) > -multiply by scale factor > -integrated this value (with a biquad: out(t) = in(t) + out(t-1) ) > -wrap the result
I tested this (attached) and it kind of works, but it doesn't seem to be phase synced, so one could just as well use a second phasor~. Or did I do something wrong? Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
phasor-wrap-filtered.pd
Description: application/puredata
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
