Jamie Bullock wrote: > Hi Cyrille, >> well, the max~ 0 is not the perfect way to remove negative value. it would >> be beter to replace the negative value with the previus value. > > Are you saying that if one replaced the negative value with the previous > value, the phasors _would_ be phase synced? It would certainly be > possible to do this if I implemented it as an external.
It would sync if the [phasor~] doesn't change frequency, otherwise some other kind of extrapolation to replace the negative value would work. Actually, if the [phasor~] is below the Nyquist frequency, shouldn't it be that you just add 1 to the negative value to get the correct positive increment? An external is probably best, with a wrap~ built into the integration loop, because summing lots of tiny values to a large accumulator leads to rounding errors pretty quickly. Thanks, Claude -- http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
