On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 16:47 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > The "addcomma", "addsemi", "adddollar" messages are a workaround, for > sure, but yeah, I suppose a more pd-ish one. I think that if SQL > gets submitted only on the right/cold inlet, then we would not need > those messages. They might come in handy though, so they could be > added later.
I think we would still need 'addsemi' to act as a statement delimiter as you showed in the subpatch of your example. > "bang" for submit sounds good too. > > As for clever hacks, I can't think of any with regexs too. Plus from > my experience, clever hacks can often lead to really strange and > difficult bugs. IMHO, we'd better off with something simple that > might be a bit harder to start on, but doesn't have odd conditions > that could trigger bugs. I agree. I don't much like the idea of maintaining a list of SQL statements for use in regex matches! Jamie -- www.postlude.co.uk _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
