On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:08:20 +0100 Derek Holzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sending a "bang" message to the [until] object, created without an > argument saying how many times the bang should be done, will give > roughly the same effect-- If only! Objects that overflow the stack cause an exception, most of which trap nicely and you get a gentle report not to do that again. Sending an unqualified bang to [until] will have you reaching for power switch because it enters a very tight loop with no exit condition and no hope of even seeing a SIGINT. I know we like to pretend this is "feature", but isn't it time to treat it as a bug? -- Use the source _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
