ilya .d wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:42:44PM +0000, Andy Farnell wrote: >> I know we like to pretend this is "feature", but isn't it time to treat it >> as a bug? >
> but havind a simple C progarmm in for(;;) doesn't cause much trouble, > SIGINT usualy kills it .. Pd is _is_ a simple C programm, and [bang(->[until] does something very similar to for(;;); > may be some protection should be considered for [bang(--[until], > so it doesn't cause the system such a DoS in this way.. i haven't actually > tested this thing yet .. > is it really true , or somehow you can kill pd when it get in such a loop ? that is what i was trying to say (too): it doesn't hang here. it might hang the system, if Pd is running with realtime-priorities. (hey this is what you asked for when turning on rt-priorities) fgmasdr IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
