On 27/01/2008, at 2.58, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > Kyle Klipowicz wrote: >> I think the question is, why have that book keeping available for >> vline~? Are there any practical uses for it? >> >> Otherwise, I don't see why it wouldn't be better to just accept a >> list >> like [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( where it starts at 0, goes to 1 in >> 1000 seconds, then goes to .5 in 1000 seconds, then goes to 0 in 2000 >> seconds. Why even have the extra digit? > > i cannot follow you here at all.
Kyle wants to, correct me if i'm wrong, translate [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000 1000, 0 2000 2000( | [vline~] into [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( | [nothirdVline~] That is have the object do the delay bookkeeping. Or maybe this would to instead: [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( | [vlineBookkeeper] | [vline~] _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list