Hallo, Steffen Juul hat gesagt: // Steffen Juul wrote: > Kyle wants to, correct me if i'm wrong, translate > > [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000 1000, 0 2000 2000( > | > [vline~] > > into > > [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( > | > [nothirdVline~] > > That is have the object do the delay bookkeeping.
Which however would prohibit things like "sustain" in an adsr-like envelope: [0, 1 10, 0.5 10 10, 0 300 200( This goes to 1 in 10msec, to 0.5 in 10 msec after that, but to 0 over 300 msec *after* 200 msec (measured from the envelope's start). With an auto-delay line object you'd need to write this: [0, 1 10, 0.5 10, 0.5 190, 0 300( One message more instead and not necessarily easier than the current version. > Or maybe this would to instead: > > [0, 1 1000, 0.5 1000, 0 2000( > | > [vlineBookkeeper] > | > [vline~] Yep, one could do a [vlineBookkeeper] like that which automatically adds up delay times, if needed. Ciao -- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__ _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
