On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote: > I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in > equal amounts! > yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration and therefore are willing to help.
> Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a > control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, > archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using > [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my > patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on. yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to go into the audio domain. > > I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as > it seems to me like quite a useful function. definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain. roman ___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list