thanks everyone, I'm using [line] and it works just how I want it! Matthew
On 12/02/2008, Roman Haefeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > sorry, forgot to attach the patch > > roman > > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 11:41 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 22:43 +0000, matthew venn wrote: > > > > > I'm a beginner with PD, and I'm finding it useful and frustrating in > > > equal amounts! > > > > > yo.. before you get too frustrated, ask the list first (as you did now). > > i'd assume that many people would be appreciative of your frustration > > and therefore are willing to help. > > > > > Right now I'm looking at ways to smooth control signals. I wanted a > > > control version of [lop~]. I couldn't find anything in the docs, > > > archives or the wiki. In the end I made the attached abstraction using > > > [lop~] and [snapshot~]. I wonder if this is inefficient? Now all my > > > patches need to have 'compute audio' turned on. > > > > yeah, this is a bit inefficient, because it is not really necessary to > > go into the audio domain. > > > > > > I'm sure I must have missed an obvious external or patch somewhere, as > > > it seems to me like quite a useful function. > > > > definitely it is. some people mentioned [line], which is probably the > > most preferrable solution in the most cases. if you _really_ want to > > have the behaviour of a [lop~], then have a look at attached patch, > > which tries to imitate a [lop~] in the message-domain. > > > > roman > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > > Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > [email protected] mailing list > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > >
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
