Hans-Christoph Steiner escribió: > On Feb 11, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Pablo Martin wrote: > > >> Andy Farnell escribió: >> >>> Hey Pablo, >>> >>> Yes it is feasible. So Apricot is to use Pd? >>> >>> >> Well its still being decided, and most team know nothing about pd, so >> they are a bit reluctant to accept this kind of risks... though they >> also understand some of the good parts, but of course i think it would >> be great. >> >> > > Hey Pablo! > > You should know that Pd is the sound engine for EA's Spore (http:// > www.spore.com/ ).
Yeah, i knew :) > As for using Pd as a library, I don't think that is feasible. You > need to have a realtime scheduler in order to use Pd, and I don't > think Pd is so modular that you can separate the objects from the Pd > scheduler. > Mmmm, not so sure what you mean (i suppose the pd internal scheduler?), but i guess the whole thing could be put in a thread maybe... don't know why but it's always seemed like it good be a good idea to have pd as a library (after using it too many times as external program)... it'd make such a cool "internal" sound system. Still... probably we could handle running it as a separate process, but maybe i've had too many bad experiences with that :P.... Any ideas how desiredata handles this? I thought they actually have a "libpd" part in the code tree... Cheers! Pablo _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
