IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > obviously it is incompatible. the reason to nevertheless do change it > was, that [list length] was not introduced before 0.40, which keeps the > potential number of victims low (esp. since Pd-extended has not yet made > it so far); if the behaviour ever needs to be changed, better do it NOW > than later. >
which reminds me: i think it would be good if Pd-extended-0.40 would have a fixed version of [list length]. fgmadsr. IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
