Even smarter might be to skip Pd-extended 0.40 and go straight from 0.39 to 0.41.
cheers Miller On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 05:44:54PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > > obviously it is incompatible. the reason to nevertheless do change it > > was, that [list length] was not introduced before 0.40, which keeps the > > potential number of victims low (esp. since Pd-extended has not yet made > > it so far); if the behaviour ever needs to be changed, better do it NOW > > than later. > > > > which reminds me: i think it would be good if Pd-extended-0.40 would > have a fixed version of [list length]. > > fgmadsr. > IOhannes > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
