On Sat, 2008-05-17 at 17:49 +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:
> Hi all,
> i'm a bit surprised that i haven't found anything in the archives, so
> what is the reason that the period of metro can't be lower than 1 ms?
> (it's limited in the source code).
> If it's a security thing, so that it prevents cpu overload it should
> at least be much lower (or even better, just > 0).
> gr~~~
i am pretty sure, it has been discussed already. though, i am not sure,
if ever anyone came up with a good reason for that behavour. to me as
well, it seems to be a pretty arbitrary choice. ([until] shouldn't
exist, if cpu usage, respectively turning pd unusable, is considered an
issue).
after all, you could make your own [micrometro] abstraction based on
[del], which hasn't such a built-in limit.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
