Hi, Thomas, I'm looking at the code right now, and I can't see what you're referring to. Is it the x_clock which is limited?
Chuck On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Thomas Grill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > i'm a bit surprised that i haven't found anything in the archives, so what > is the reason that the period of metro can't be lower than 1 ms? (it's > limited in the source code). > If it's a security thing, so that it prevents cpu overload it should at > least be much lower (or even better, just > 0). > gr~~~ > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
