I'm interested in this too... I'm deep inside something else right now but will check this out when I can.
cheers M On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 02:23:11PM +0200, cyrille henry wrote: > ok, if you don't wish to compile in order to test, here are 2 samples : > > http://www.chdh.free.fr/tab/tabosc4.wav > http://www.chdh.free.fr/tab/tabosc4c.wav > > note that this is the worst case for tabread4~ : a very small table play at > low frequency. > > for bigger table, the difference can be very small. > here is a picture of the patch used to make this samples : > http://www.chdh.free.fr/tab/patch.jpg > > cyrille > > > Andy Farnell a ?crit : > > > > I'm really looking forward to giving this the 'ear test'. > > > > Maybe I'm growing old but differerences in interpolation > > methods are very subtle to my perception. What would be the > > hard case to test it? It would be when the signal is greatly > > transposed, right? > > > > Remember when I tested your stab at sinc interpolation Charles, > > I honestly couldn't hear an big difference, there was one, but > > hard to define. > > > > Andy > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
