On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Andy Farnell wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:50:44 -0400 (EDT) > Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Andy Farnell wrote: >> >>> with [tabread4~] being good enough for playing back files at >>> their original rate, >> >> If you are going to playback at original rate, [tabread4] is both >> useless >> and 10 times slower than [tabread]. All that [tabread4] is good >> at, is >> playing back at different non-original rates (that is anything >> else than >> +1 times and -1 times). >> >> _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... >> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec > > > Yes that'right, hmm I guess I knew that but said it in a woolly way > > Amend that to > > [tabread~] - "play back at exactly" the original rate > [tabread4~] - "play back at close to the orginal rate" > [tabread4c~] - "play back with wider transposition"
> Perhaps these could have more descriptive names, especially if there was a "tabread", etc. library. Some quick ideas: [tabread_tweak~] [tabread_transpose~] .hc > > -- > Use the source > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- kill your television _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
