Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On Jun 17, 2008, at 8:36 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > > > > In Debian, and probably other distros, /usr/lib is not for user- > modified/user-added files, that's the problem with /usr/lib/pd. So > if we are going to follow the /usr/share policy, then we should > follow related policies as well.
this is what i am trying to say. /usr/lib is NOT for user-modified/user-added files AND /usr/share is NOT for user-modified/user-added files no-one (but the package-maintainers), esp. not a "user", must but anything into /usr (with the noteable exception of /usr/local) > > Then if it uses /usr/local/lib/pd, that would conflict with user- > installed Pd versions. so how about /usr/local/lib/pd-extended ? (see the other email) mfg.asd IOhannes _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
