On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think that gridflow would probably be more easily maintained outside
of Pd-extended, for now at least.
GridFlow is not in a situation much different from Gem or PDP. It's just
that there's more of an incentive to get Gem running in pd-extended, than
there is to get GridFlow running. I'm talking about today's GridFlow,
which is quite Rubyless. I think that basically you say that because you
simply don't feel like handling it.
Now I have a contract item that is to include GridFlow in pd-extended, or
if that fails, at least to make a version of pd-extended that has GridFlow
in it. It is likely that it gets done in June, perhaps even in the next
few days.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
