Thanx for the link Claude.
It seems there is no way to force to close the connection (wait 10 mn  
or reboot the computer or change the port), it's a pity.
++

Jack


Le 20 juil. 08 à 12:34, Claude Heiland-Allen a écrit :

> Jack wrote:
>> Le 19 juil. 08 à 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>>> Quoting Claude Heiland-Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>>
>>>> [dumpOSC 5555] needs to be able to bind to network port 5555, if
>>>> something else is already using it (or if the previous user of  
>>>> the  port
>>>> hasn't timed out completely) then dumpOSC will fail to create.
>>> which btw, is by design and not a bug.
>>> it is the very same behaviour as the [netreceive] object has.
>> This is a real problem with [netreceive]. For example when Pd  
>> crash,  if you open your last patch, Pd can't create your  
>> [netreceive] with  the same port. Is it possible to force to close  
>> connection on this  port to solve the problem ?
>> ++
>
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-06/050710.html
>
>> Jack
>>> and before i forget it: have i already said that i would advice
>>> everybody to _not_ use [dumpOSC] (as part of the OSCx library) and
>>> instead use mrpeach's [udpreceive] and [unpackOSC]?
>>>
>>> fadrm
>>> IOhannes
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> [email protected] mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/  
>>> listinfo/pd-list
>> _______________________________________________
>> [email protected] mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
>> listinfo/pd-list
>


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Reply via email to