OK, i will try 'killall pd' next time. Thanx Hans. ++ Jack
Le 20 juil. 08 à 19:13, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit : > > On Jul 19, 2008, at 7:24 PM, Jack wrote: > >> >> Le 19 juil. 08 à 17:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : >> >>> Quoting Claude Heiland-Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>>> >>>> [dumpOSC 5555] needs to be able to bind to network port 5555, if >>>> something else is already using it (or if the previous user of the >>>> port >>>> hasn't timed out completely) then dumpOSC will fail to create. >>> >>> which btw, is by design and not a bug. >>> it is the very same behaviour as the [netreceive] object has. >> This is a real problem with [netreceive]. For example when Pd crash, >> if you open your last patch, Pd can't create your [netreceive] with >> the same port. Is it possible to force to close connection on this >> port to solve the problem ? > > Try running 'killall pd' to make sure there isn't a hung pd process > still running. Otherwise, you have to wait for the OS to free the > network port. That's not a pd-specific problem, but network > sockets in general. > > .hc > > > >> ++ >> >> Jack >> >> >>> >>> and before i forget it: have i already said that i would advice >>> everybody to _not_ use [dumpOSC] (as part of the OSCx library) and >>> instead use mrpeach's [udpreceive] and [unpackOSC]? >>> >>> fadrm >>> IOhannes >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> [email protected] mailing list >>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >>> listinfo/pd-list >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> [email protected] mailing list >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ >> listinfo/pd-list > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------ > > Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. > It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and > expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war > on terrorism. - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom > > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
