On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 18:58 -0400, Martin Peach wrote:
> Yes, and [unpackOSC] has no way of knowing if it is getting data from
> UDP or TCP so it should probably assume the worst and go for TCP. In
> fact, to be unbreakably robust it should assume it is getting input one
> byte at a time and not output anything until either an entire OSC packet
> has been received or the packet is not valid OSC.
this is how i would like [unpackOSC] to behave. i don't see any other
way to do OSC over tcp.
roman
___________________________________________________________
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
