> Sorry if this might seem ignorant, but would it be an idea to make > [lop], [hip] and so on objects for convenience sake to come with the > distribution that would go alongside the names the audio objects? This > might only be me being used to the supercollider syntax of adding a .ar > (for audio, or ~) or .kr (for control, float) after the object/class > name.
i don't think, it is feasible to write straight-forward objects for message filtering ... pd has no notion of control rate, as supercollider or csound have ... messages can be used to emulate control rate signals, however there is no guarantee that control rate events occur monotonic, nor a way to figure out its sampling rate by downsampling subpatches you can probably get close to the semantics of control-rate in other systems, although it might lack some expressive power best, tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tim.klingt.org Your mind will answer most questions if you learn to relax and wait for the answer. William S. Burroughs _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
