On Oct 9, 2008, at 5:33 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: >> Sorry if this might seem ignorant, but would it be an idea to make >> [lop], [hip] and so on objects for convenience sake to come with the >> distribution that would go alongside the names the audio objects? >> This >> might only be me being used to the supercollider syntax of adding >> a .ar >> (for audio, or ~) or .kr (for control, float) after the object/class >> name. > > i don't think, it is feasible to write straight-forward objects for > message filtering ... > > pd has no notion of control rate, as supercollider or csound have ... > messages can be used to emulate control rate signals, however there > is no > guarantee that control rate events occur monotonic, nor a way to > figure > out its sampling rate > > by downsampling subpatches you can probably get close to the > semantics of > control-rate in other systems, although it might lack some expressive > power > > best, tim
I think [lop] and [hip] could be handy. As for the control rate issue, the mapping library has [resample] for this purpose. If you want to ensure a steady message rate, using something like [resample 100]. .hc > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://tim.klingt.org > > Your mind will answer most questions if you learn to relax and wait > for the answer. > William S. Burroughs > > > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ > listinfo/pd-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- 'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink-collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
