> What do you think might be the better approach, to use ubuntu normal, or > ubuntustudio? Roman told me that for a while there's no big difference, > because the -rt kernel comes with ubuntu. Is ubuntustudio more than a > bundle of software with nice backgrounds? (Note: I'll use the same setup > on both computers, so the system should work on 64 and 32b).
As far as I know, "Studio" is just plain Ubuntu that comes with a set of software relevant to audio & video. As a matter of fact, installing the "studio (or a name of that sort)" meta package on plain Ubuntu is the same as starting out with a "studio" installation CD/DVD. Probably it is just the matter of preference in images used for the startup screen and the default wall paper. -- David Shimamoto _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
