Am 15.07.2009 um 11:05 schrieb cyrille henry:
Max a écrit :Am 14.07.2009 um 21:19 schrieb Martin Schied:@Frank: Thanks for that suggestion but I couldn't find mails in the list saying that pd~ did the job for Max Neupert. In fact his only mail I could find was about pd~ not working some time ago..?it does work nicely. i think it's the way how to split audio and video in two separate processes to avoid interference.no, it will not avoid interference.it's the way to go if you have a dual core computer and wish do dedicated 1 core for the audio, and 1 core (+ GPU) for the images rendering. but since the 2 pd instance are synchronised at audio rate, if the video processing is using more then 100% of a CPU, then it will slow down both pd instance and you should then ear click on the audio.
true. to avoid that slow down the framerate dynamically if cpu usage is approaching 100% in the rendering process.
to avoid interference, you should use 2 pd, and connect them via netsend.
that did the job but there are some difficulties with that approach: if an instance with netserver crashes the port will be blocked for some time.
max
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
