On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Chris McCormick<[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 12:30:29PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote: >> Yep, it's a damn pity I used the tabwrite~ name for the wrong object! We're >> all stuck with it now. >> >> I've been planning to put an object like this into Pd for many years, but >> can't think of a "correct" name... anyone have a better idea than >> "tabwriteat~" > > Maybe you could pass [tabwrite~] an argument to specify whether it should have > an extra 'index' inlet? > > Chris.
Doesn't tabwrite~ have a second inlet to set the name of the array (It's been awhile)? If so, then what harm could there be in re-writing the object with 3 inlets? Would it break something? Chuck _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
