Hallo, Charles Henry hat gesagt: // Charles Henry wrote: > Doesn't tabwrite~ have a second inlet to set the name of the array > (It's been awhile)? If so, then what harm could there be in > re-writing the object with 3 inlets? Would it break something?
It just has one inlet, you change the table to set with "set NAME" messages into the first inlet. So, yes, adding a second inlet should not change anything there. But it gets a bit tricky later on: How should you deal with a [bang( message that goes into the first inlet when there's something connected to the new audio-index inlet? There is a conflict of interest, which IMO is better solved with a new object. Actually I like the name [tabfeed~], as it somehow describes, that with audio index inlets you kind of constantly feed data into the table. Ciao -- Frank _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
