Pd-dev must be a quiet list indeed when even stuff like what to name
future objects gets discussed here ;-)
D.
Matt Barber wrote:
Hallo,
Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
Hmm, tabindex~ diesn't make it clear that stuff is actually going into the
table.
With tabindex~ I also would assume, that I'm *getting* the value at a certain
index position, tabread~ style.
vtabwrite~ sounds OK, as do tabpoke~ or tabput~ or tabwriteto~ ... ?
I think, vtabwrite~ maybe could be used to make a "v"-version of tabwrite~, by
which I mean something, that acts correctly with clock-delayed messages as
vsnapshot~, vline~ etc. do.
The "v" could also stand for "variable," as in [vd~]. Could you have
[vtabwrite~] and [vtabwrite4~]? The interpolation scheme could get a
little tricky... I think we discussed this a few months ago when
someone asked for amounted to a variable [delwrite~] with
interpolation.
--
::: derek holzer ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista :::
http://www.vimeo.com/macumbista :::
---Oblique Strategy # 198:
"Instead of changing the thing,
change the world around it."
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
